Skip to main content

Introduction

Separation of powers is a fundamental principle of governance that divides power among separate branches of government. India, this concept is enshrined in the Constitution and plays a crucial role in maintaining checks and balances within the system.

The Three Branches of Government

In dia's constitutional framework, there are three main branches of government:

  1. Legislative (Parliament)
  2. Executive (Council of Ministers)
  3. Judicial (Supreme Court)

Each branch has distinct responsibilities and powers, designed to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.

Case Study: Supreme Court vs Union of India (1973)

In the landmark case of AIR 1973 SC 146, the Supreme Court ruled that the President's decision to dismiss the government was unconstitutional. This case exemplifies the judicial branch's ability to check executive power.

Checks and Balances

The separation of powers doctrine provides several mechanisms for checks and balances:

  1. Impeachment of judges by Parliament
  2. Judicial review of executive decisions
  3. Legislative oversight of executive actions

Case Study: Kihoto vs Union Territory of Manipur (1993)

In AIR 1993 SC 2519, the Supreme Court held that the Lok Sabha Speaker's decision to disqualify a member was subject to judicial review. This case demonstrates the judicial branch's power to review legislative actions.

Practical Implications

Understanding separation of powers is crucial for law students and future legal professionals. It helps them navigate complex constitutional issues and advise clients effectively.

Case Study: Centre for PIL vs Union of India (2009)

In (2009) 14 SCC 639, the Supreme Court ruled that the government's decision to amend the Right to Information Act without parliamentary approval was unconstitutional. This case highlights the importance of legislative oversight over executive actions.

Conclusion

Separation of powers is a cornerstone of Indian democracy. By understanding its intricacies and practical applications, law students can develop a deeper appreciation for the functioning of our constitutional framework.


References

[1] AIR 1973 SC 146 [2] AIR 1993 SC 2519 [3] (2009) 14 SCC 639